From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752600AbcFVVCk (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:02:40 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44707 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751059AbcFVVCi (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:02:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:02:15 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Rob Landley Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT apply to initramfs/initmpfs. Message-ID: <20160622210215.GA25333@kroah.com> References: <576AE1C5.5090909@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <576AE1C5.5090909@landley.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 02:06:45PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > From: Rob Landley > > Make CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT apply to initramfs/initmpfs. > > Update help text, slightly improve error reporting, move /dev/console open > down after devtmpfs mount, don't check IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) before > mounting devtmpfs (it's always there, even if just a ramfs alias), and > report whether we think we're using tmpfs or ramfs for rootfs. That's a lot of different things to be doing all at once in the same patch. Can you please break these out into individual logical changes? thanks, greg k-h