From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751882AbcF0Pwf (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:52:35 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53411 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385AbcF0Pwe (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:52:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:52:29 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Juri Lelli Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, luca.abeni@unitn.it Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity Message-ID: <20160627155229.GE30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1466156921-12417-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20160617094935.1d4df586@gandalf.local.home> <20160617162837.GQ5981@e106622-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160617162837.GQ5981@e106622-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:28:37PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 17/06/16 09:49, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:48:41 +0100 > > Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > > setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses > > > one of them to setup a new dl_entity. > > > > > > > Actually this patch is making it so that setup_new_dl_entity() only > > uses one of the parameters. Can you note why that change happened. > > Because this change log implies that the second parameter wasn't used > > before this patch, and that is incorrect. > > > > True, but we were practically already using the same parameter, under a > different name though, after > > 2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity" > > as we currently do: > > setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl) > > > This patch reverts part of the change done in > > commit 2d3d891d334 "sched/deadline: Add SCHED_DEADLINE inheritance > > logic" > > > > Before Luca's change we were doing > > setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se) > > in update_dl_entity() for a dl_se->new entity. So, I guess the question > is actually why we wanted to use pi_se's parameters (the potential PI > donor) for setting up a new entity? Maybe we broke the situation where a > task is currently boosted by a DEADLINE waiter and we swich the holder > to DEADLINE? > > > It would be nice to have the reason in the change log. > > > > Thanks a lot for pointing out what might be more than inaccuracy in the > changelog. Will you be reposting with a new Changelog?