linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, seanpaul@google.com,
	marcheu@google.com, m.chehab@samsung.com,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_teardown()
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:17:52 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160628151752.GL2508@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57729235.7040308@amd.com>

2016-06-28 Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>:

> Am 28.06.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Gustavo Padovan:
> > 2016-06-28 Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>:
> > 
> > > Am 27.06.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Gustavo Padovan:
> > > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> > > > 
> > > > As the array of fence callbacks held by an active struct fence_array
> > > > each has a reference to the struct fence_array, when the owner of the
> > > > fence_array is freed it must dispose of the callback references before
> > > > it can free the fence_array. This can not happen simply during
> > > > fence_release() because of the extra references and so we need a new
> > > > function to run before the final fence_put().
> > > As I said previously as well, this is completely superfluous.
> > > 
> > > The fence array keeps a reference to itself as long as not all callbacks are
> > > signaled.
> > > 
> > > So you only need to unregister your callback from the array itself and drop
> > > your reference when you don't need it any more in the sync file.
> > Exactly, this should be called from sync_file_free() because of the
> > following use case:
> > 
> > 	1. You create 2 sync_file with 1 fence each
> > 	2. Merge both fences, which creates a fence array
> > 	3. Close the sync_file fd without waiting for the fences to
> > 	signal
> > 
> > At this point you leak the fence-array because the final fence_put()
> > does not release it because of the extra references from the non
> > signalled fences so we need to clean up this somehow.
> 
> No, there won't be any leak and you don't need to cleanup anything.
> 
> The fences contained in the fence array are already enabled for signaling.
> So they will eventually signal sooner or later and drop the reference to the
> fence array freeing it when the last one finished.
> 
> This was done to avoid the need to call fence_remove_callback() all the time
> on the fences in the array because of the warning on the function.

Right. I understand it now.

	Gustavo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-28 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-27 19:29 [RFC v2 0/3] dma-buf/sync_file: rework fences on struct sync_file Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-27 19:29 ` [RFC v2 1/3] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_is_array() Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-27 19:29 ` [RFC v2 2/3] dma-buf/fence-array: add fence_array_teardown() Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-28  9:56   ` Christian König
2016-06-28 14:17     ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-28 15:05       ` Christian König
2016-06-28 15:17         ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2016-06-27 19:29 ` [RFC v2 3/3] dma-buf/sync_file: rework fence storage in struct file Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-28  8:02   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 14:25     ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-06-28 15:09       ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 15:27         ` Gustavo Padovan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160628151752.GL2508@joana \
    --to=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniels@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ghackmann@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=marcheu@google.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@google.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).