From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752005AbcF3KrE (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:47:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34575 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751757AbcF3KrC (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:47:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:41:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, Al Viro , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Message-ID: <20160630094123.GA29268@gmail.com> References: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dave Hansen wrote: > Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so > that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty > minor. > include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +- > include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 + > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +- > mm/mprotect.c | 134 +- So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI extensions. Thanks, Ingo