linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BCACHE (BLOCK LAYER CACHE)"
	<linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT" 
	<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block: fix blk_queue_split() resource exhaustion
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:20:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160704082006.GN3239@soda.linbit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMTp17gcM8HEMrZ+0TJWgpGk+VWDgC7t+rMAancWZEFFw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 06:28:29PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> The idea looks good, but not sure it can cover all cases of
> dm over brbd or brbd over dm and maintaining two lists
> becomes too complicated.
> 
> One clean solution may be to convert the loop of generic_make_request()
> into the following way:
> 
> do {
>     struct bio *splitted, *remainder = NULL;
>     struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
> 
>     blk_queue_split(q, &bio, &remainder, q->bio_split);
> 
>     ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
> 
>     if (remainder)
>          bio_list_add(current->bio_list, remainder);
>     bio = bio_list_pop(current->bio_list);
> } while (bio)

Not good enough.

Consider DRBD on device-mapper on device-mapper on scsi,
or insert multipath and / or md raid into the stack.
The iterative call to q->make_request_fn() in the second iteration
may queue bios after the remainder.

Goal was to first process all "deeper level" bios
before processing the remainder.

You can achieve this by doing last-in-first-out on bio_list,
or by using two lists, as I suggested in the original post.

    Lars

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-04  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22  8:22 [RFC] block: fix blk_queue_split() resource exhaustion Lars Ellenberg
2016-06-24 11:36 ` Ming Lei
2016-06-24 14:27   ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-06-24 15:15     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-28  8:24       ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-06-25  9:30     ` [RFC] " Ming Lei
2016-06-28  8:45       ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-02 10:03         ` Ming Lei
2016-07-02 10:28 ` Ming Lei
2016-07-04  8:20   ` Lars Ellenberg [this message]
2016-07-04 10:47     ` Ming Lei
2016-07-06 12:38       ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-06 15:57         ` Ming Lei
2016-07-07  8:03           ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-07 13:14             ` Ming Lei
2016-07-07  5:35 ` [dm-devel] " NeilBrown
2016-07-07  8:16   ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-07 12:39     ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-07 12:47       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-07 22:07     ` [dm-devel] [RFC] " NeilBrown
2016-07-08  8:02       ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08  9:39         ` NeilBrown
2016-07-08 13:00           ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 13:59             ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 11:08       ` Ming Lei
2016-07-08 12:52         ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-07-08 13:05           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-07 12:45   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-07-07 22:40     ` NeilBrown
2016-07-07 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160704082006.GN3239@soda.linbit \
    --to=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roland.kammerer@linbit.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).