From: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] spi: s3c64xx: use unsigned type for fifo handling variables
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:01:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160705150121.GF1257@jack.zhora.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160705145556.GD6247@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
> > The 'quirks' variable cannot ever be negative, therefore use u8
> > instead of int. The 8 bit size is given from the fact that
> > currently the quirks variable has very few statuses.
> >
> > The rx_lvl_offset and tx_st_done store shift values, so that u8
> > is a proper size.
> >
> > fifo_lvl_mask stores a series of masks, to be in we will keep the
> > 32 bit size.
>
> What's the advantage of these changes? This feels like microptimisation
> of something that shouldn't be a big performance issue and it's not
> always the case that the compiler does something more sensible with
> smaller or unsigned types. I'm not saying don't do it, I'm just saying
> that it's not clear to me what the win is.
not much indeed. Just something that was a little bothering me
while I was reading through.
Please, feel free to drop it.
Thanks,
Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 2:41 [PATCH v2 0/5] s3c64xx: consider the case of a disconnected CS line and some code rework Andi Shyti
2016-06-28 2:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: s3c64xx: group the CS signalling writes in a single function Andi Shyti
2016-06-28 2:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: s3c64xx: consider the case when the CS line is not connected Andi Shyti
2016-06-30 12:15 ` Applied "spi: s3c64xx: consider the case when the CS line is not connected" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2016-06-28 2:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: s3c64xx: do not configure the device twice Andi Shyti
2016-06-28 2:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] spi: s3c64xx: simplify if statement in prepare_transfer function Andi Shyti
2016-06-28 2:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] spi: s3c64xx: use unsigned type for fifo handling variables Andi Shyti
2016-07-05 14:55 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 15:01 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160705150121.GF1257@jack.zhora.eu \
--to=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox