From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755023AbcGFNvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:51:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:35534 "EHLO mail-pf0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754657AbcGFNu7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:50:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:50:57 -0700 From: Viresh Kumar To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Johan Hovold , Alex Elder Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c-dev: Don't block the adapter from unregistering Message-ID: <20160706135057.GI2671@ubuntu> References: <021486be2f5425ce2379219a7ac163ee14ba2aba.1467772840.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20160706065523.GA1439@tetsubishi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160706065523.GA1439@tetsubishi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06-07-16, 15:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Adding something to *every* i2c_client for this corner case sounds > pretty expensive to me. I agree with you on that. I wanted to avoid it, but I couldn't :( Lets see how Jean suggests to handle it. -- viresh