public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de,
	sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	minchan@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] lockdep: Implement bitlock map allocator
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:22:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707102206.GG2279@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704072925.GY2279@X58A-UD3R>

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:29:25PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > 3. I think this is more general approach because _any_ random bit in 
> > >    memory can be used as a lock. Do we need to restrict where the bit
> > >    is so that we can place lockdep_map explicitly around the bit?
> > 
> > Again, yuck!
> 
> You mean we should never provide lockdep checking mechanism tranparently,
> but the user of bit-based lock must add lockdep_map manually, case by
> case. Right? Do I understand correctly? If so, I wonder why?

I will stop it if it cannot provide any valuable things even I wonder.
I seriously asked it since I wonder it. What do you think about my
question? Is there something I missed?

Or can I proceed it after fixing my bug you pointed?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-20  4:55 [PATCH 0/5] Implement bitlock map allocator Byungchul Park
2016-06-20  4:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] lockdep: " Byungchul Park
2016-06-30 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-01  0:24     ` Byungchul Park
2016-07-01  7:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-04  7:29         ` Byungchul Park
2016-07-07 10:22           ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2016-07-13 20:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-18  1:46             ` Byungchul Park
2016-06-20  4:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: Apply bitlock to bit_spin_lock Byungchul Park
2016-06-20  4:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram Byungchul Park
2016-06-20 15:36   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-21  1:05     ` Byungchul Park
2016-06-20  4:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs/buffer.c: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2016-06-20  4:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to BH_Uptodate_Lock Byungchul Park
2016-06-29 12:45 ` [PATCH 0/5] Implement bitlock map allocator Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160707102206.GG2279@X58A-UD3R \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox