From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: riel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, fweisbec@redhat.com,
wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, efault@gmx.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] irqtime: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:30:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160708123010.GD30200@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467315350-3152-5-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:35:50PM -0400, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>
> Drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq.
> Instead, have softirq and hardirq track their time spent
> independently, with the softirq code subtracting hardirq
> time that happened during the duration of the softirq run.
>
> The softirq code can be interrupted by hardirq code at
> any point in time, but it can check whether it got a
> consistent snapshot of the timekeeping variables it wants,
> and loop around in the unlikely case that it did not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
So the purpose is to get rid of local_irq_save/restore()?
Is it really worth such complication?
> ---
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index a0aefd4c7ea6..b78991fac228 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cpu_hardirq_time);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cpu_softirq_time);
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, irq_start_time);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, hardirq_start_time);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, softirq_start_time);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, prev_hardirq_time);
> static int sched_clock_irqtime;
>
> void enable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
> @@ -41,6 +43,7 @@ void disable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, irq_time_seq);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, softirq_time_seq);
> #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
>
> /*
> @@ -53,36 +56,79 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, irq_time_seq);
> * softirq -> hardirq, hardirq -> softirq
> *
> * When exiting hardirq or softirq time, account the elapsed time.
> + *
> + * When exiting softirq time, subtract the amount of hardirq time that
> + * interrupted this softirq run, to avoid double accounting of that time.
> */
> void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr, int irqtype)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> + u64 prev_softirq_start;
> + bool leaving_softirq;
> + u64 prev_hardirq;
> + u64 hardirq_time;
> s64 delta;
> int cpu;
>
> if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> return;
>
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> -
> cpu = smp_processor_id();
> - delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - __this_cpu_read(irq_start_time);
> - __this_cpu_add(irq_start_time, delta);
>
> - irq_time_write_begin();
> + /*
> + * Hardirq time accounting is pretty straightforward. If not in
> + * hardirq context yet (entering hardirq), set the start time.
> + * If already in hardirq context (leaving), account the elapsed time.
> + */
> + if (irqtype == HARDIRQ_OFFSET) {
> + bool leaving_hardirq = hardirq_count();
> + delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - __this_cpu_read(hardirq_start_time);
> + __this_cpu_add(hardirq_start_time, delta);
> + if (leaving_hardirq) {
> + hardirq_time_write_begin();
> + __this_cpu_add(cpu_hardirq_time, delta);
> + hardirq_time_write_end();
> + }
This doesn't seem to work with nesting hardirqs.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 19:35 [PATCH v3 0/4] sched,time: fix irq time accounting with nohz_idle riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: count actually elapsed irq & softirq time riel
2016-07-05 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 13:08 ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-05 14:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 " Rik van Riel
2016-07-06 14:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] nohz,cputime: replace VTIME_GEN irq time code with IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] irqtime: add irq type parameter to irqtime_account_irq riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] irqtime: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq riel
2016-07-08 12:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2016-07-08 13:19 ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-08 14:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-08 14:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-08 15:56 ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-08 23:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] sched,time: fix irq time accounting with nohz_idle Nikolay Borisov
2016-07-05 13:09 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160708123010.GD30200@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox