From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Song Shan Gong <gongss@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC V1]s390/perf: fix 'start' address of module's map
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:18:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160708151836.GG31763@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467856176-8712-1-git-send-email-gongss@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:49:36AM +0800, Song Shan Gong wrote:
> At preset, when creating module's map, perf gets 'start' address by parsing
> 'proc/modules', but it's module base address, isn't the start address of
> '.text' section. In most archs, it's OK. But for s390, it places 'GOT' and
> 'PLT' relocations before '.text' section. So there exists an offset between
> module base address and '.text' section, which will incur wrong symbol
> resolution for modules.
>
> Fix this bug by getting 'start' address of module's map from parsing
> '/sys/module/[module name]/sections/.text', not from '/proc/modules'.
cool, does this fix the 'perf test 1' for s390? that'd be great
I'll send few coments shortly
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 1:49 [PATCH] [RFC V1]s390/perf: fix 'start' address of module's map Song Shan Gong
2016-07-08 2:17 ` Songshan Gong
2016-07-08 15:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-08 15:18 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-07-11 8:11 ` Songshan Gong
2016-07-13 3:32 ` Songshan Gong
2016-07-08 15:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-08 15:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-08 15:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-11 11:06 ` Songshan Gong
2016-07-11 12:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-13 6:39 ` Songshan Gong
2016-07-13 9:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-15 7:45 ` Songshan Gong
2016-07-15 8:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-15 13:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160708151836.GG31763@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=gongss@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox