Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags from DT to the ipu-di driver

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 25 May 2016 15:18:16 +0200 Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > The 'de-active' and 'pixelclk-active' DT properties are evaluated
> > by of_parse_display_timing() called from  of_get_drm_display_mode(),
> > but later lost in the conversion from videomode.flags to
> > drm_display_mode.flags.
> > Use an open coded version of of_get_drm_display_mode() to get access
> > to these flags and make sure they are passed on to the ipu-di driver.
> > 
> > Changes vs. v2:
> >   - removed patches which have already been applied
> >   - created a drm_bus_flags_from_videomode() helper to prevent code
> >     duplication as suggested by Philipp Zabel
> > 
> > Changes vs. v1:
> >   - rebased on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9113791/ as
> >     per Philipp Zabel's request
> > 
> > GIT: [PATCHv2 1/3] drm/imx: imx-ldb: honor 'native-mode' property when
> > GIT: [PATCHv2 2/3] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags
> > GIT: [PATCHv2 3/3] drm/imx: remove dead code

Should this be split up into 3 patches? At least it's good practice to
split up the drm core helper functions into it's own patch, instead of
hiding it behind something with the drm/imx prefix - no one will spot it
that way.

> Ping?!

If imx maintainers keep being asleep at the helm I can merge this through
drm-misc, but I'd like some more tested-by from other folks if possible.
Even better when there's a review.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch