From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Subject: [PATCH RT 3/4] x86: Fix an RT MCE crash
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:54:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160712205458.695041038@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20160712205444.115211356@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0003-x86-Fix-an-RT-MCE-crash.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]
3.2.81-rt117-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
On some x86 systems an MCE interrupt would come in before the kernel
was ready for it. Looking at the latest RT code, it has similar
(but not quite the same) code, except it adds a bool that tells if
MCE handling is initialized. That was required because they had
switched to use swork instead of a kernel thread. Here, just
checking to see if the thread is NULL is good enough to see if
MCE handling is initialized.
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index b08a373f66fb..fc02fe279ddc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1206,7 +1206,8 @@ static int mce_notify_work_init(void)
static void mce_notify_work(void)
{
- wake_up_process(mce_notify_helper);
+ if (mce_notify_helper)
+ wake_up_process(mce_notify_helper);
}
#else
static void mce_notify_work(void)
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 20:54 [PATCH RT 0/4] Linux 3.2.81-rt117-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 20:54 ` [PATCH RT 1/4] Revert: KVM: lapic: mark LAPIC timer handler as irqsafe Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 20:54 ` [PATCH RT 2/4] trace: correct off by one while recording the trace-event Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-07-12 20:54 ` [PATCH RT 4/4] Linux 3.2.81-rt117-rc1 Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-12 19:08 [PATCH RT 0/4] Linux 3.4.112-rt143-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 19:08 ` [PATCH RT 3/4] x86: Fix an RT MCE crash Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160712205458.695041038@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox