From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751968AbcGMMxT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:53:19 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:44640 "EHLO
	relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751044AbcGMMxL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:53:11 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 50.39.163.18
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 05:52:33 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        "moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR INTERFACE" 
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "open list:KEXEC" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a kexec_crash_loaded() function
Message-ID: <20160713125232.GA32462@x>
References: <20160713121950.14969.78606.stgit@hananiah.suse.cz>
 <20160713121955.14969.69080.stgit@hananiah.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160713121955.14969.69080.stgit@hananiah.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:19:55PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int kexec_crash_loaded(void)
> +{
> +	return !!kexec_crash_image;
> +}

Nit: this function should return bool rather than int, since it
effectively returns true/false.