From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751933AbcGNSrF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:47:05 -0400
Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:50002 "EHLO
	mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751451AbcGNSrD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:47:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:46:03 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <x86@kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes
Message-ID: <20160714184603.GR4194@windriver.com>
References: <20160714001901.31603-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
 <20160714130443.GA27637@gmail.com>
 <20160714151835.GO4194@windriver.com>
 <20160714183903.GA16975@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160714183903.GA16975@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes] On 14/07/2016 (Thu 20:39) Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I'll continue testing with the setup_percpu.c change left out.
> > 
> > Let me know if you want a resend or if you want to just add the
> > asm/desc.h locally or ...
> 
> So I tried the asm/desc.h but saw other build failures - for now gave up.
> Can we do this in a separate patch?

Yes of course.  In the meantime I'll investigate further and add more
configs to my testing.  Is there a list of the configs used for sanity
testing tip somewhere?

Thanks, 
Paul.
--

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo