From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752318AbcGRXlk (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:41:40 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:48288 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752266AbcGRXli (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:41:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:41:32 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Message-ID: <20160718234132.GI2207@kernel.org> References: <20160715170654.0b09a8bc@canb.auug.org.au> <20160715072243.GP30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160715073119.GR30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160715150903.GA2523@redhat.com> <20160715152436.GB2523@redhat.com> <20160715154326.GC2523@redhat.com> <20160718151845.4de6e274@canb.auug.org.au> <20160718203634.GF2207@kernel.org> <20160719082235.42aec856@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160719082235.42aec856@canb.auug.org.au> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:22:35AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > Hi Arnaldo, > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Em Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:04:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu: > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:26 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack? Stephen, does it work > > > >> for you? > > > > > > Sorry, no. See my other email. > > > > > > > > I am cross building (if that makes a difference). > > > > For me to try to reproduce the problem, yes, what is the environment? > > Cross-compiling to what target? > > I am using a x86_64 compiler (target) on powerpc64le (host). > Yesterday, the x86_64 allmodconfig build failed just after I merged the > tip tree (i.e. without the luto-misc tree being involved). At that > point I have merged quite a few trees, though. Also, I do not clean my > object tree between builds. The compiler is v5.2.0 built from upstream > sources. Ok, one of the possible reasons was for tools/{include,lib,perf,objtool} code to be including code directly from the kernel, and that was still the case for some headers, I fixed those and pushed to Ingo now, if he pulls lets see if this fixes things. - Arnaldo