From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752057AbcGUJLk (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:11:40 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:34009 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751880AbcGUJLh (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:11:37 -0400
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:11:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Reorganize and clean up the BIOS area
 reservation code
Message-ID: <20160721091132.GA22986@gmail.com>
References: <7c190e9b3376002014fb99234ed5e5c64df86322.1469064662.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <20160721081438.GA26531@gmail.com>
 <92DA2E2A-BCD9-4198-A983-395A06388688@zytor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <92DA2E2A-BCD9-4198-A983-395A06388688@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> We already reserve the first megabyte by default.  There is something really 
> bizarre about this; the bug report simply doesn't seem to make any sense.

Maybe the first megabyte reservation happens after the SMP trampoline allocation 
and hence the EBDA/BIOS reservation matters to our ability to allocate the SMP 
trampoline specifically?

Anyway, agreed that we need more information.

Thanks,

	Ingo