From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:37:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160722143739.GI18962@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160722034118.guckaniobf3f7czc@treble>
Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:41:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > It just looks like objtool was not written with cross compilation in
> > mind?
> I don't know yet what the specific problem is, but objtool should work
> fine in a cross-compiled environment. It needs to be compiled with the
> host (powerpc) compiler, but then it needs to disassemble target (x86)
> files. It worked fine before the bitsperlong.h files were merged.
So, trying to summarize from the various messages in this thread:
In Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:26:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> It produces these errors (from the x86_64 allmodconfig build):
>
> In file included from
> /home/sfr/next/next/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h:10:0,
> from /usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:11,
> from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/types.h:27,
> from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/types.h:9,
> from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/list.h:4,
> from elf.h:23,
> from elf.c:30:
> /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:13:2:
> error: #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
> #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
> ^
So it starts at tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h, and as
you mention, this should've instead be using the host headers, i.e.:
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
Which it will if it uses HOSTARCH in tools/objtool/Makefile when setting
up the header search path, I have two csets in my perf/core branch that
fixes this, and that are equivalent to the last patch Stephen tried:
$ git log --oneline -2
87f7dc54366a objtool: Use tools/scripts/Makefile.arch to get ARCH and HOSTARCH
0eec6770ab60 tools build: Add HOSTARCH Makefile variable
$
Ok, so now it uses the right file, see the whole sequence at the end of this
e-mail, but it boils down to:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#if defined(__powerpc64__)
# define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
#else
# define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
#endif
#ifdef __SIZEOF_LONG__
#define BITS_PER_LONG (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__)
#else
#define BITS_PER_LONG __WORDSIZE
#endif
#if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG
#error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
#endif
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which I think has no problems, right? The last problem reported ty Stephen now is:
In Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:23:02 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> That gets me this errors from the x86_64 allmodconfig build:
> tools/objtool/objtool-in.o: In function `decode_instructions':
> tools/objtool/builtin-check.c:276: undefined reference to `arch_decode_instruction'
Should work, since ARCH should be x86 and then tools/objtool/Build will have
this:
objtool-y += arch/$(ARCH)/
Turned into:
objtool-y += arch/x86/
Which will build tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c, that will provide that
arch_decode_instruction() function :-\
I.e. with the two patches I mentioned, that are equivalent to the last patch I
sent to Stephen for testing, we would end up with HOSTARCH=powerpc and
ARCH=x86, no?
- Arnaldo
Full sequence:
[acme@jouet linux]$ cat tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
#ifndef __ASM_POWERPC_BITSPERLONG_H
#define __ASM_POWERPC_BITSPERLONG_H
#if defined(__powerpc64__)
# define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
#else
# define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
#endif
#include <asm-generic/bitsperlong.h>
#endif /* __ASM_POWERPC_BITSPERLONG_H */
[acme@jouet linux]$
It, like the kernel, where these files come from, has:
[acme@jouet linux]$ cat tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG
#define __ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG
#include <uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h>
#ifdef __SIZEOF_LONG__
#define BITS_PER_LONG (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__)
#else
#define BITS_PER_LONG __WORDSIZE
#endif
#if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG
#error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
#endif
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG */
[acme@jouet linux]$
And finally:
[acme@jouet linux]$ cat tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
#ifndef _UAPI__ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG
#define _UAPI__ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG
/*
* There seems to be no way of detecting this automatically from user
* space, so 64 bit architectures should override this in their
* bitsperlong.h. In particular, an architecture that supports
* both 32 and 64 bit user space must not rely on CONFIG_64BIT
* to decide it, but rather check a compiler provided macro.
*/
#ifndef __BITS_PER_LONG
#define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
#endif
#endif /* _UAPI__ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG */
[acme@jouet linux]$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 7:06 linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-15 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 15:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 15:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:43 ` [PATCH/RFC] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 16:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-07-18 5:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18 20:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-18 20:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-18 22:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18 23:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 0:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 0:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 3:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 12:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 17:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 23:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 23:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-20 2:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-20 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-20 3:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-20 3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-20 23:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-21 13:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-21 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-22 3:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 14:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-07-22 19:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 19:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-22 19:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 19:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-23 5:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-24 18:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-25 12:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-25 18:12 ` [tip:perf/core] x86: Make the vdso2c compiler use the host architecture headers tip-bot for Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-25 18:11 ` [tip:perf/core] tools build: Fix objtool build with ARCH=x86_64 tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-25 18:11 ` [tip:perf/core] objtool: Always use host headers tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-16 20:46 ` [tip:perf/core] tools: Simplify BITS_PER_LONG define tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160722143739.GI18962@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).