Re: [PATCH 5/5] mfd: sunxi-gpadc-mfd: probe sunxi-gpadc-ts driver

Lee Jones
2016-07-25T10:20:58Z

On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> On 21/07/16 07:08, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Quentin,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:29:11AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >> This probes the touchscreen driver for Allwinner SoCs (A10, A13 and A31)
> >> when the property "allwinner,ts-attached" is set in the GPADC (rtp) node of
> >> the DT.
> >>
> >> Some comestic modifications done to shorten and increase readability of the
> >> code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mfd/sunxi-gpadc-mfd.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sunxi-gpadc-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/sunxi-gpadc-mfd.c
> >> index 05a000b..9b9ed0b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/sunxi-gpadc-mfd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sunxi-gpadc-mfd.c
> >> @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
> >> #define SUNXI_IRQ_TEMP_DATA 1
> >> #define SUNXI_IRQ_TP_UP 2
> >>
> >> +#define SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL(_name, _resources, _num_resources) { \
> >> + .name = _name, \
> >> + .resources = _resources, \
> >> + .num_resources = _num_resources \
> >> +}
> >>
> >> static struct resource adc_resources[] = {
> >> {
> >> @@ -64,33 +69,45 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip sunxi_gpadc_mfd_regmap_irq_chip = {
> >> };
> >>
> >> static struct mfd_cell sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells[] = {
> >> - {
> >> - .name = "sun4i-a10-gpadc-iio",
> >> - .resources = adc_resources,
> >> - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources),
> >> - }, {
> >> - .name = "iio_hwmon",
> >> - }
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sun4i-a10-gpadc-iio", adc_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources)),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("iio_hwmon", NULL, 0),
> >> };
> >>
> >> static struct mfd_cell sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells[] = {
> >> - {
> >> - .name = "sun5i-a13-gpadc-iio",
> >> - .resources = adc_resources,
> >> - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources),
> >> - }, {
> >> - .name = "iio_hwmon",
> >> - },
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sun5i-a13-gpadc-iio", adc_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources)),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("iio_hwmon", NULL, 0),
> >> };
> >>
> >> static struct mfd_cell sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells[] = {
> >> - {
> >> - .name = "sun6i-a31-gpadc-iio",
> >> - .resources = adc_resources,
> >> - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources),
> >> - }, {
> >> - .name = "iio_hwmon",
> >> - },
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sun6i-a31-gpadc-iio", adc_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources)),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("iio_hwmon", NULL, 0),
> >> +};
> >
> > This should be part of a separate patch.
> >
> >> +
> >> +static struct mfd_cell sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts[] = {
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sun6i-a31-gpadc-iio", adc_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources)),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("iio_hwmon", NULL, 0),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sunxi-gpadc-ts", ts_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(ts_resources)),
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct mfd_cell sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts[] = {
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sun5i-a13-gpadc-iio", adc_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources)),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("iio_hwmon", NULL, 0),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sunxi-gpadc-ts", ts_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(ts_resources)),
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct mfd_cell sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts[] = {
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sun6i-a31-gpadc-iio", adc_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources)),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("iio_hwmon", NULL, 0),
> >> + SUNXI_GPADC_MFD_CELL("sunxi-gpadc-ts", ts_resources,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(ts_resources)),
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct regmap_config sunxi_gpadc_mfd_regmap_config = {
> >> @@ -142,23 +159,45 @@ static int sunxi_gpadc_mfd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> - "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ts"))
> >> - ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> - sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> >> - ARRAY_SIZE(sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells), NULL,
> >> - 0, NULL);
> >> - else if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> - "allwinner,sun5i-a13-ts"))
> >> - ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> - sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> >> - ARRAY_SIZE(sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells), NULL,
> >> - 0, NULL);
> >> - else if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> - "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ts"))
> >> - ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> - sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> >> - ARRAY_SIZE(sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells), NULL,
> >> - 0, NULL);
> >> + "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ts")) {
> >> + if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> + "allwinner,ts-attached"))
> >> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> + sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts),
> >> + NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> + else
> >> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> + sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells),
> >> + NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> + } else if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> + "allwinner,sun5i-a13-ts")) {
> >> + if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> + "allwinner,ts-attached"))
> >> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> + sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts),
> >> + NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> + else
> >> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> + sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells),
> >> + NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> + } else if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> + "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ts")) {
> >> + if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node,
> >> + "allwinner,ts-attached"))
> >> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> + sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells_ts),
> >> + NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> + else
> >> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sunxi_gpadc_mfd_dev->dev, 0,
> >> + sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells),
> >> + NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> + }
> >
> > Please don't use any of_device_is_compatible.
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Why? (Just curious...)

'cos they make for ugly code.

Use of_match_device() instead.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog