From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752752AbcGYOYV (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:24:21 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:41598 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752141AbcGYOYM (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:24:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:24:07 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] /dev/random driver changes for 4.8 Message-ID: <20160725142407.GG10966@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org References: <20160725064424.GA29098@thunk.org> <20160725171515.737d61ae@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160725171515.737d61ae@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:15:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ted, > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 02:44:24 -0400 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864: > > > > Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/random.git tags/random_for_linus > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 86a574de4590ffe6fd3f3ca34cdcf655a78e36ec: > > > > random: strengthen input validation for RNDADDTOENTCNT (2016-07-03 17:09:33 -0400) > > Of course none of this has been in linux-next since the random tree was > dropped in March because it had not been updated for more than a year at > that point. > > However, at least half of these look like bug fixes (cced to stable). > > Should I reinstate the random tree to linux-next? Yes, please do. It was getting zero-day checks, and I assumed it was in linux-next; I should have checked, though. - Ted