From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wang Shu <shuwang@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:23:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160725162348.GA23947@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160725162332.GA23935@redhat.com>
Example:
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
do_something_slow(p, t);
if (SPENT_TOO_MANY_TIME) {
for_each_process_thread_break(p, t);
rcu_read_unlock();
schedule();
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread_continue(&p, &t);
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
This looks similar to rcu_lock_break(), but much better and the next patch
changes check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() to use these new helpers. But my
real target is show_state_filter() which can trivially lead to lockup.
Compared to rcu_lock_break(), for_each_process_thread_continue() never gives
up, it relies on fact that both process and thread lists are sorted by the
task->start_time key. So, for example, even if both leader/thread are already
dead we can find the next alive process and continue.
TODO: This is another indication we should rename pid_alive(tsk) (and probably
change it), most users call it to ensure that rcu_read_lock() still protects
this tsk.
NOTE: it seems that, contrary to the comment, task_struct->start_time is not
really monotonic, and this should be probably fixed. Until then _continue()
might skip more threads with the same ->start_time than necessary.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/exit.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 253538f..004c9d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2859,6 +2859,16 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
#define for_each_process_thread(p, t) \
for_each_process(p) for_each_thread(p, t)
+static inline void
+for_each_process_thread_break(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ get_task_struct(p);
+ get_task_struct(t);
+}
+
+extern void
+for_each_process_thread_continue(struct task_struct **, struct task_struct **);
+
static inline int get_nr_threads(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return tsk->signal->nr_threads;
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 9e6e135..08f49d4 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -210,6 +210,48 @@ repeat:
goto repeat;
}
+void for_each_process_thread_continue(struct task_struct **p_leader,
+ struct task_struct **p_thread)
+{
+ struct task_struct *leader = *p_leader, *thread = *p_thread;
+ struct task_struct *prev, *next;
+ u64 start_time;
+
+ if (pid_alive(thread)) {
+ /* mt exec could change the leader */
+ *p_leader = thread->group_leader;
+ } else if (pid_alive(leader)) {
+ start_time = thread->start_time;
+ prev = leader;
+
+ for_each_thread(leader, next) {
+ if (next->start_time > start_time)
+ break;
+ prev = next;
+ }
+
+ *p_thread = prev;
+ } else {
+ start_time = leader->start_time;
+ prev = &init_task;
+
+ for_each_process(next) {
+ if (next->start_time > start_time)
+ break;
+ prev = next;
+ }
+
+ *p_leader = prev;
+ /* a new thread can come after that, but this is fine */
+ *p_thread = list_last_entry(&prev->signal->thread_head,
+ struct task_struct,
+ thread_node);
+ }
+
+ put_task_struct(leader);
+ put_task_struct(thread);
+}
+
/*
* Determine if a process group is "orphaned", according to the POSIX
* definition in 2.2.2.52. Orphaned process groups are not to be affected
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-25 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-25 16:23 [PATCH 0/3] introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-25 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 20:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-08 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] hung_task.c: change rcu_lock_break() code to use for_each_process_thread_break/continue Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] hung_task.c: change the "max_count" " Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers) Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/1] stop_machine: touch_nmi_watchdog() after MULTI_STOP_PREPARE Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-27 8:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-27 10:42 ` [tip:core/urgent] stop_machine: Touch_nmi_watchdog() " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160725162348.GA23947@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuwang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox