From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753331AbcGYR0c (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:26:32 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39056 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752687AbcGYR0a (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:26:30 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:26:26 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>,
        Rom Lemarchand <romlem@google.com>, Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu_sync: simplify the state machine, introduce
 __rcu_sync_enter()
Message-ID: <20160725172626.GC24149@redhat.com>
References: <20160715164938.GA4294@redhat.com>
 <20160715180140.GM7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160716171007.GA30000@redhat.com>
 <20160719205018.GB7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160720171602.GA5059@redhat.com>
 <20160720213144.GM7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160721173435.GB22488@redhat.com>
 <20160722032641.GE7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160725170116.GA24149@redhat.com>
 <CALAqxLWcgGv6N02Pqkxui6e4yHCX=TbC1RyySEq7V-WoaMa+mA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLWcgGv6N02Pqkxui6e4yHCX=TbC1RyySEq7V-WoaMa+mA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 07/25, John Stultz wrote:
>
> Can you also make clear which patches of PeterZ's I should be adding
> as well for testing?  I've lost the plot as to what goes with what..

Well, my understanding is that Peter is going to send v2 with some minor
changes, I am going to send this patch on top of his series.

In particular 2/2 should set GP_PASSED rather than !GP_IDLE. It would be
nice to also rename rcu_sync_sabotage() to rcu_sync_enter_start(), this
will save another change in cgroup.c, but this is minor.

Oleg.