From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:13:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160725214322-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160725075009.GA25638@infradead.org>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:50:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:38:23AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On other systems, including SPARC and PPC64, virtio-pci devices are
> > enumerated as though they are behind an IOMMU, but the virtio host
> > ignores the IOMMU, so we must either pretend that the IOMMU isn't
> > there or somehow map everything as the identity.
> >
> > Add a feature bit to detect that quirk: VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.
> >
> > Any device with this feature bit set to 0 needs a quirk and has to be
> > passed physical addresses (as opposed to bus addresses) even though
> > the device is behind an IOMMU.
>
> This is the wrong way around.
Well given there are tons of quirky devices out there
and they have this bit set to 0, I don't think we can change this.
New devices will have it set to 1.
> > Note: it has to be a per-device quirk because for example, there could
> > be a mix of passed-through and virtual virtio devices. As another
> > example, some devices could be implemented by an out of process
> > hypervisor backend (in case of qemu vhost, or vhost-user) and so support
> > for an IOMMU needs to be coded up separately.
> >
> > It would be cleanest to handle this in IOMMU core code, but that needs
> > per-device DMA ops. While we are waiting for that to be implemented, use
> > a work-around in virtio core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > wanted to use per-device dma ops but that does not
> > seem to be ready. So let's put this in virtio
> > code for now, and move when it becomes possible.
>
> So work on making it ready. We're close to there, and given that
> virtio needs it, finish it off. We now have everyone using the
> operation vectors for DMA, so the only thing you need is a dma_ops
> pointer in struct device initialized to what get_dma_ops returns.
And then pci_dma_configure would have a quirk to
set that for legacy virtio devices?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-25 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-19 2:38 [PATCH v3] virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-07-23 21:32 ` kbuild test robot
2016-07-24 22:44 ` kbuild test robot
2016-07-25 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-25 19:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-07-26 18:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160725214322-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox