From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753750AbcGZGiX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 02:38:23 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:33345 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752518AbcGZGiW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 02:38:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:38:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8
Message-ID: <20160726063817.GA17368@gmail.com>
References: <20160725082838.GA16210@gmail.com>
 <20160725235330.07c231a3@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20160725151520.GA5030@gmail.com>
 <20160725153536.GA5715@gmail.com>
 <20160726072123.497240f2@canb.auug.org.au>
 <CA+55aFykGfw2ijEXPreqBqE7mpqEr7WSD1NK8FHmrqwOxZD5BQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160726075903.18bcef41@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160726075903.18bcef41@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Linus,
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:45:53 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build
> > > problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build
> > > failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency).
> > > After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly
> > > before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ...  
> > 
> > Ugh. It's merged in my tree now, because I thought it was ok. Can
> > somebody point me to the fix?
> 
> I only affects cross building of the objtool and vdso2c tools (which is
> how I work).  The latest version of the perf/core branch in the tip
> tree now has all the fixes, so I assume that Ingo will send another
> pull request.

Yes, I'll send this ASAP.

> Unfortunately, that means that your tree is broken for me this
> morning ... but I will cope, I guess.

That's weird, I pushed out the fix from Arnaldo yesterday (about 8 hours ago) 
which should merge fine with Linus's tree and make your tooling combination work.

Thanks,

	Ingo