From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757450AbcGZRaA (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:30:00 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:45362 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757428AbcGZR36 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:29:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:29:38 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Alexander Viro , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , Ross Zwisler , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv1, RFC 00/33] ext4: support of huge pages Message-ID: <20160726172938.GA9284@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Alexander Viro , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , Ross Zwisler , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <1469493335-3622-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1469493335-3622-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:35:02AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Here's the first version of my patchset which intended to bring huge pages > to ext4. It's not yet ready for applying or serious use, but good enough > to show the approach. Thanks. The major issues I noticed when doing a quick scan of the patches you've already mentioned here. I'll try to take a closer look in the next week or so when I have time. One random question --- in the huge=always approach, how much additional work would be needed to support file systems with a 64k block size on a system with 4k pages? - Ted