From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wang Shu <shuwang@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] stop_machine: touch_nmi_watchdog() after MULTI_STOP_PREPARE
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:57:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160726185736.GB4088@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160726185712.GA4088@redhat.com>
Suppose that stop_machine(fn) hangs because fn() hangs. In this case NMI
hard-lockup can be triggered on another CPU which does nothing wrong and
the trace from nmi_panic() won't help to investigate the problem.
And this change "fixes" the problem we (seem to) hit in practice.
- stop_two_cpus(0, 1) races with show_state_filter() running on CPU_0.
- CPU_1 already spins in MULTI_STOP_PREPARE state, it detects the soft
lockup and tries to report the problem.
- show_state_filter() enables preemption, CPU_0 calls multi_cpu_stop()
which goes to MULTI_STOP_DISABLE_IRQ state and disables interrupts.
- CPU_1 spends more than 10 seconds trying to flush the log buffer to
the slow serial console.
- NMI interrupt on CPU_0 (which now waits for CPU_1) calls nmi_panic().
Reported-by: Wang Shu <shuwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/stop_machine.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index a467e6c..4a1ca5f 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/smpboot.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/lglock.h>
+#include <linux/nmi.h>
/*
* Structure to determine completion condition and record errors. May
@@ -209,6 +210,13 @@ static int multi_cpu_stop(void *data)
break;
}
ack_state(msdata);
+ } else if (curstate > MULTI_STOP_PREPARE) {
+ /*
+ * At this stage all other CPUs we depend on must spin
+ * in the same loop. Any reason for hard-lockup should
+ * be detected and reported on their side.
+ */
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
} while (curstate != MULTI_STOP_EXIT);
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-25 16:23 [PATCH 0/3] introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-02 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-03 20:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-08 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] hung_task.c: change rcu_lock_break() code to use for_each_process_thread_break/continue Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] hung_task.c: change the "max_count" " Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers) Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-26 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-07-27 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] stop_machine: touch_nmi_watchdog() after MULTI_STOP_PREPARE Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-27 10:42 ` [tip:core/urgent] stop_machine: Touch_nmi_watchdog() " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160726185736.GB4088@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuwang@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox