* [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
@ 2016-07-23 7:58 Vegard Nossum
2016-07-27 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2016-07-23 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-kernel, Vegard Nossum, Paul E. McKenney, Thomas Gleixner,
Ingo Molnar, Rusty Russel
This message is currently really useless since it always prints a value
that comes from the printk() we just did, e.g.:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8119db33>] down_trylock+0x13/0x80
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/freezer.h:56
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff811aaa37>] console_unlock+0x2f7/0x930
Here, both down_trylock() and console_unlock() is somewhere in the
printk() path.
We should save the value before calling printk() and use the saved value
instead. That immediately reveals the offending callsite:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 14971, name: trinity-c2
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff819bcd46>] rhashtable_walk_start+0x46/0x150
(Bug report: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=146925979821849&w=2)
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7171cf9..87689a6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3144,9 +3144,18 @@ static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val) { }
*/
static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
+#endif
+
if (oops_in_progress)
return;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+ preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
+#endif
+
printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling while atomic: %s/%d/0x%08x\n",
prev->comm, prev->pid, preempt_count());
@@ -3157,7 +3166,7 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
if (in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
- print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+ print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
pr_cont("\n");
}
#endif
@@ -7541,6 +7550,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
{
static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
+#endif
rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
@@ -7551,6 +7563,11 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
return;
prev_jiffy = jiffies;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+ preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
+#endif
+
printk(KERN_ERR
"BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at %s:%d\n",
file, line);
@@ -7568,7 +7585,7 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
if (!preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
- print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+ print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
pr_cont("\n");
}
#endif
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
2016-07-23 7:58 [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful Vegard Nossum
@ 2016-07-27 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-27 9:36 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2016-07-27 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, Paul E. McKenney,
Thomas Gleixner, Rusty Russel
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> wrote:
> This message is currently really useless since it always prints a value
> that comes from the printk() we just did, e.g.:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
> Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8119db33>] down_trylock+0x13/0x80
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/freezer.h:56
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
> Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff811aaa37>] console_unlock+0x2f7/0x930
>
> Here, both down_trylock() and console_unlock() is somewhere in the
> printk() path.
>
> We should save the value before calling printk() and use the saved value
> instead. That immediately reveals the offending callsite:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 14971, name: trinity-c2
> Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff819bcd46>] rhashtable_walk_start+0x46/0x150
>
> (Bug report: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=146925979821849&w=2)
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7171cf9..87689a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3144,9 +3144,18 @@ static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val) { }
> */
> static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> + unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
> +#endif
> +
> if (oops_in_progress)
> return;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> + /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
> + preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
> +#endif
These two blocks could be merged trivially, avoiding an #ifdef pair ...
> +
> printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling while atomic: %s/%d/0x%08x\n",
> prev->comm, prev->pid, preempt_count());
>
> @@ -3157,7 +3166,7 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> if (in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
> pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
> - print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
> + print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
> pr_cont("\n");
> }
> #endif
> @@ -7541,6 +7550,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
> void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> {
> static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> + unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
> +#endif
>
> rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
> if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
> @@ -7551,6 +7563,11 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> return;
> prev_jiffy = jiffies;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> + /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
> + preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
> +#endif
> +
> printk(KERN_ERR
> "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at %s:%d\n",
> file, line);
> @@ -7568,7 +7585,7 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> if (!preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
> pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
> - print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
> + print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
> pr_cont("\n");
Ditto.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
2016-07-27 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2016-07-27 9:36 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-07-27 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2016-07-27 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Vegard Nossum, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, LKML,
Paul E. McKenney, Thomas Gleixner, Rusty Russel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1346 bytes --]
On 27 July 2016 at 11:15, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> wrote:
[...]
> These two blocks could be merged trivially, avoiding an #ifdef pair ...
>> @@ -7541,6 +7550,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
>> void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
>> {
>> static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
>> + unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
>> +#endif
>>
>> rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
>> if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
>> @@ -7551,6 +7563,11 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
>> return;
>> prev_jiffy = jiffies;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
>> + /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
>> + preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
>> +#endif
>
> Ditto.
I'm assuming you want to declare and initialise preempt_disable_ip at
once here, but it generates slightly worse code since it dereferences
current->preempt_disable_ip in the "fast path" (i.e. a sleeping
function is NOT called from an invalid context).
If you really prefer that I've attached an updated patch.
Let me know if I misunderstood :-)
Vegard
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-sched-core-make-Preemption-disabled-at-message-more-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3284 bytes --]
From 332d49d4da90f00304de73c7412311576e2e7f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 09:46:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
This message is currently really useless since it always prints a value
that comes from the printk() we just did, e.g.:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8119db33>] down_trylock+0x13/0x80
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/freezer.h:56
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff811aaa37>] console_unlock+0x2f7/0x930
Here, both down_trylock() and console_unlock() is somewhere in the
printk() path.
We should save the value before calling printk() and use the saved value
instead. That immediately reveals the offending callsite:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 14971, name: trinity-c2
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff819bcd46>] rhashtable_walk_start+0x46/0x150
(Bug report: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=146925979821849&w=2)
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7171cf9..e06354e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3144,6 +3144,11 @@ static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val) { }
*/
static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+ unsigned long preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
+#endif
+
if (oops_in_progress)
return;
@@ -3157,7 +3162,7 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
if (in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
- print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+ print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
pr_cont("\n");
}
#endif
@@ -7541,6 +7546,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
{
static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+ unsigned long preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
+#endif
rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
@@ -7568,7 +7577,7 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
if (!preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
- print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+ print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
pr_cont("\n");
}
#endif
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
2016-07-27 9:36 ` Vegard Nossum
@ 2016-07-27 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-27 12:25 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2016-07-27 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum
Cc: Vegard Nossum, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, LKML,
Paul E. McKenney, Thomas Gleixner, Rusty Russel
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 July 2016 at 11:15, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > These two blocks could be merged trivially, avoiding an #ifdef pair ...
>
> >> @@ -7541,6 +7550,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
> >> void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> >> {
> >> static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> >> + unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
> >> if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
> >> @@ -7551,6 +7563,11 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> >> return;
> >> prev_jiffy = jiffies;
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> >> + /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
> >> + preempt_disable_ip = current->preempt_disable_ip;
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> I'm assuming you want to declare and initialise preempt_disable_ip at
> once here, but it generates slightly worse code since it dereferences
> current->preempt_disable_ip in the "fast path" (i.e. a sleeping
> function is NOT called from an invalid context).
Could you please add a likely() branch to see whether GCC will delay the
initialization?
The 4 #ifdefs were really ugly, so yes, it would be nice to at least reduce them
to 2.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
2016-07-27 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2016-07-27 12:25 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2016-07-27 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Vegard Nossum
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Paul E. McKenney,
Thomas Gleixner, Rusty Russel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 573 bytes --]
On 07/27/2016 12:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm assuming you want to declare and initialise preempt_disable_ip at
>> once here, but it generates slightly worse code since it dereferences
>> current->preempt_disable_ip in the "fast path" (i.e. a sleeping
>> function is NOT called from an invalid context).
>
> Could you please add a likely() branch to see whether GCC will delay the
> initialization?
>
> The 4 #ifdefs were really ugly, so yes, it would be nice to at least reduce them
> to 2.
How about this?
Vegard
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-sched-core-make-Preemption-disabled-at-message-more-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4505 bytes --]
>From 9d0e4bb63f0fada627a4f99432db8d39add487b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 09:46:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
This message is currently really useless since it always prints a value
that comes from the printk() we just did, e.g.:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8119db33>] down_trylock+0x13/0x80
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/freezer.h:56
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff811aaa37>] console_unlock+0x2f7/0x930
Here, both down_trylock() and console_unlock() is somewhere in the
printk() path.
We should save the value before calling printk() and use the saved value
instead. That immediately reveals the offending callsite:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 14971, name: trinity-c2
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff819bcd46>] rhashtable_walk_start+0x46/0x150
(Bug report: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=146925979821849&w=2)
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 253538f2..cdbcc2e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -3142,6 +3142,15 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
#endif
}
+static inline unsigned long get_preempt_disable_ip(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ return p->preempt_disable_ip;
+#else
+ return 0;
+#endif
+}
+
/*
* Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
* task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7171cf9..afd2403 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3144,6 +3144,9 @@ static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val) { }
*/
static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
{
+ /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+ unsigned long preempt_disable_ip = get_preempt_disable_ip(current);
+
if (oops_in_progress)
return;
@@ -3154,13 +3157,12 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
print_modules();
if (irqs_disabled())
print_irqtrace_events(prev);
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
- if (in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT)
+ && in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
- print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+ print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
pr_cont("\n");
}
-#endif
dump_stack();
add_taint(TAINT_WARN, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
}
@@ -7541,6 +7543,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
{
static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
+ unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
@@ -7551,6 +7554,9 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
return;
prev_jiffy = jiffies;
+ /* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+ preempt_disable_ip = get_preempt_disable_ip(current);
+
printk(KERN_ERR
"BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at %s:%d\n",
file, line);
@@ -7565,13 +7571,12 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
debug_show_held_locks(current);
if (irqs_disabled())
print_irqtrace_events(current);
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
- if (!preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT)
+ && !preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
- print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+ print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
pr_cont("\n");
}
-#endif
dump_stack();
add_taint(TAINT_WARN, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-27 12:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-23 7:58 [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful Vegard Nossum
2016-07-27 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-27 9:36 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-07-27 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-27 12:25 ` Vegard Nossum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox