From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755092AbcHATs3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:48:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:36264 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755061AbcHATsW (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:48:22 -0400 From: Steve Muckle X-Google-Original-From: Steve Muckle Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:48:18 -0700 To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] cpufreq / sched: Check cpu_of(rq) in cpufreq_update_util() Message-ID: <20160801194818.GY19455@graphite.smuckle.net> References: <3752826.3sXAQIvcIA@vostro.rjw.lan> <2892951.2FPdDYdaoa@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160801072957.GA4220@light.dominikbrodowski.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160801072957.GA4220@light.dominikbrodowski.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:29:57AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > A small nitpick: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:36:01AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/sched.h > > +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/sched.h > > @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct update_util_data > > > > /** > > * cpufreq_update_util - Take a note about CPU utilization changes. > > - * @time: Current time. > > + * @rq: Runqueue to carry out the update for. > > * > > * This function is called by the scheduler on every invocation of > > * update_load_avg() on the CPU whose utilization is being updated. > > This comment seems to need an update due to the smp_processor_id() check > being moved into this function. The callers of this have also changed - it is no longer called directly by update_load_avg(), rather via cfs_rq_util_change() from several other locations (I believe it was my patch that failed to update this comment). Could this be replaced with a more generic statement such as "called by CFS in various paths?" thanks, Steve