public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: Fix targets for objcopy usage
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:50:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802095040.GC19251@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKE=J1v7_9sbRsY+0Jzf99nXcx98KQ3PmFLn81Ns69dWw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:25:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:30:39PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> The targets for lkdtm's objcopy were missing which caused them to always
> >> be rebuilt. This corrects the problem.
> >>
> >> Additionally, commit f8fa70f392fa ("arm64: localise Image objcopy flags")
> >> has landed now, so this removes the work-around for the global OBJCOPY
> >> flag setting.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >
> > With this applied, LKDTM builds fine for me on arm64, the redundant
> > rebuilds are gone, and the result appears to work. So FWIW:
> >
> > Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Argh, it looks like ARM suffers the same global OBJCOPY problem, so
> I'm going to leave that change out. :(

:(

FWIW, I dropped a patch for ARM [1] in Russell's patch system [2]. Hopefully
that will be picked up during the v4.9 merge window.

Looking again, it appears a number of other arches might be affected:

[mark@leverpostej:~/src/linux]% git grep 'OBJCOPYFLAGS\s\+:=' -- arch/*/Makefile
arch/arm/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS  :=-O binary -R .comment -S
arch/blackfin/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS     := -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S
arch/cris/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS := -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S
arch/ia64/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS := --strip-all
arch/m32r/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS := -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S
arch/metag/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS                                := -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S
arch/mn10300/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS      := -O binary -R .note -R .comment -R .GCC-command-line -R .note.gnu.build-id -S
arch/openrisc/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS    := -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S
arch/s390/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS := -O binary
arch/sh/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS   := -O binary -R .note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment \
arch/unicore32/Makefile:OBJCOPYFLAGS            := -O binary -R .note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment -S

... so we probably need to fix up these first, regardless.

In the mean time, can we add the targets dependency, but leave the flags
work-around intact? 

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-July/442974.html
[2] http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8588/1

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-29  2:30 [PATCH] lkdtm: Fix targets for objcopy usage Kees Cook
2016-07-29  9:37 ` Mark Rutland
2016-08-01 21:25   ` Kees Cook
2016-08-02  9:50     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-08-02 15:18       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160802095040.GC19251@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox