From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754679AbcHBLPY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:15:24 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:2796 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754452AbcHBLNR (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:13:17 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,459,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1018183413" From: Baole Ni To: cmetcalf@mellanox.com, dalias@libc.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 0029/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:35:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802103537.15705-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- arch/tile/kernel/sysfs.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/tile/kernel/sysfs.c index 825867c..cef3937 100644 --- a/arch/tile/kernel/sysfs.c +++ b/arch/tile/kernel/sysfs.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static ssize_t chip_width_show(struct device *dev, { return sprintf(page, "%u\n", smp_width); } -static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_width, 0444, chip_width_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_width, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, chip_width_show, NULL); static ssize_t chip_height_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static ssize_t chip_height_show(struct device *dev, { return sprintf(page, "%u\n", smp_height); } -static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_height, 0444, chip_height_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_height, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, chip_height_show, NULL); static ssize_t chip_serial_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static ssize_t chip_serial_show(struct device *dev, { return get_hv_confstr(page, HV_CONFSTR_CHIP_SERIAL_NUM); } -static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_serial, 0444, chip_serial_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_serial, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, chip_serial_show, NULL); static ssize_t chip_revision_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static ssize_t chip_revision_show(struct device *dev, { return get_hv_confstr(page, HV_CONFSTR_CHIP_REV); } -static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_revision, 0444, chip_revision_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(chip_revision, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, chip_revision_show, NULL); static ssize_t type_show(struct device *dev, @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static ssize_t type_show(struct device *dev, { return sprintf(page, "tilera\n"); } -static DEVICE_ATTR(type, 0444, type_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(type, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, type_show, NULL); #define HV_CONF_ATTR(name, conf) \ static ssize_t name ## _show(struct device *dev, \ @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static ssize_t hv_stats_store(struct device *dev, return n < 0 ? n : count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(hv_stats, 0644, hv_stats_show, hv_stats_store); +static DEVICE_ATTR(hv_stats, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, hv_stats_show, hv_stats_store); static int hv_stats_device_add(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) { -- 2.9.2