public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "\"Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑\"" <zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	dyoung@redhat.com, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kdump: add description of bringing up SMP dump-capture kernel
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:09:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802140955.GB3663@x1.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57A05E7D.90101@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 08/02/16 at 04:49pm, "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On 08/02/2016 03:46 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> >Hi Wenjian,
> >
> >On 08/01/16 at 08:23am, Zhou Wenjian wrote:
> >>v1->v2: change nr_cpus to maxcpus
> >>
> >>SMP dump-capture kernel is useful to improve the performance of kdump in
> >>some cases. So add the description of bringing up SMP dump-capture kernel.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Zhou Wenjian <zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> >Discussed with people, it could be better to adjust the
> >description about nr_cpus and maxcpus part. I think you can still
> >describe nr_cpus/maxcpus in patch 1/2, and keep parallel dumping part in
> >2/2.
> >
> >Originally maxcpus=1 is used for all ARCHes. Later people found
> >nr_cpus=1 is better since nr_cpus decides the number of possible cpu
> >while maxcpus decides the max working cpu after system boot. So nr_cpus
> >can save memory because percpu will pre-allocate memory for each
> >possible cpu for hotplug. So on x86 nr_cpus is used because much memory
> >can be saved if possible cpu number is very large.
> >
> >So you can mention that both maxcpus and nr_cpus can be used but nr_cpus
> >has advantage if it has been implemented in some ARCHes like x86_64. And
> >I guess you mush have tested parallel dumping feature with nr_cpus
> >specified, it makes sense to tell people with the real situation.
> >
> 
> I think it is better to describe the difference in somewhere else.
> Maybe, it's a good choice which just replace maxcpus by maxcpus/nr_cpus.
> Then user can choose maxcpus or nr_cpus.
> What do you think about it?

Putting it in kdump.txt could be better. nr_cpus/maxcpus are normal
kernel options, the reason we mentioned them here is crashkernel memory
is usually limited, we have to try our best to save memory. So if
nr_cpus is available on some ARCHes, we should use it. On x86 nr_cpus=1
has been taken for kdump kernel for a very long time. I think letting
people know below things would be good:

~~~~~~~~~~
Firslty both maxcpus and nr_cpus can be used for kdump kernel to specify
number of allowed cpu.

maxcpus only specify the number of available cpu, while nr_cpus will
specify the number of possible cpu which is necessary for hotplug.
nr_cpus can be used to limit the amount of percpu memory pre-allocation.
And now you just test parallel dumping feature on x86, or more
specifically on x86_64.
~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks
Baoquan

      reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01  0:23 [PATCH v2] Documentation: kdump: add description of bringing up SMP dump-capture kernel Zhou Wenjian
2016-08-02  7:46 ` Baoquan He
2016-08-02  8:49   ` "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"
2016-08-02 14:09     ` Baoquan He [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160802140955.GB3663@x1.redhat.com \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox