public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code in rr_select_path()
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:27:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160805152705.GA17480@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803153545.GE20370@bblock-ThinkPad-W530>

On Wed, Aug 03 2016 at 11:35am -0400,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hej Mike,
> 
> when running a debug-kernel today with several multipath-devices using
> the round-robin path selector I noticed that the kernel throws these
> warnings here:
> 
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kdmwork-252:0/881
> caller is rr_select_path+0x36/0x108 [dm_round_robin]
> CPU: 1 PID: 881 Comm: kdmwork-252:0 Not tainted 4.7.0-debug #4
>        00000000617679b8 0000000061767a48 0000000000000002 0000000000000000
>        0000000061767ae8 0000000061767a60 0000000061767a60 00000000001145d0
>        0000000000000000 0000000000b962ae 0000000000bb291e 000000000000000b
>        0000000061767aa8 0000000061767a48 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>        0700000000b962ae 00000000001145d0 0000000061767a48 0000000061767aa8
> Call Trace:
> ([<00000000001144a2>] show_trace+0x8a/0xe0)
> ([<0000000000114586>] show_stack+0x8e/0xf0)
> ([<00000000006c7fdc>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe0)
> ([<00000000006fbbc0>] check_preemption_disabled+0x108/0x130)
> ([<000003ff80268646>] rr_select_path+0x36/0x108 [dm_round_robin])
> ([<000003ff80259a42>] choose_path_in_pg+0x42/0xc8 [dm_multipath])
> ([<000003ff80259b62>] choose_pgpath+0x9a/0x1a0 [dm_multipath])
> ([<000003ff8025b51a>] __multipath_map.isra.5+0x72/0x228 [dm_multipath])
> ([<000003ff8025b75e>] multipath_map+0x3e/0x50 [dm_multipath])
> ([<000003ff80225eb6>] map_request+0x66/0x458 [dm_mod])
> ([<000003ff802262ec>] map_tio_request+0x44/0x70 [dm_mod])
> ([<000000000016835a>] kthread_worker_fn+0xf2/0x1d8)
> ([<00000000001681da>] kthread+0x112/0x120)
> ([<000000000098378a>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc)
> ([<0000000000983784>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc)
> no locks held by kdmwork-252:0/881.
> 
> 
> There are several more of these warnings, but all have the same
> stack-trace (this is on s390x, but this looks like its only common code)
> - sometimes the process-context is multipath.
> 
> Looking at the changes in this function, it rather looks like this is
> caused by changes made in commit
> b0b477c7e0dd93f8916d106018ded1331b81bf61 (dm round robin: use percpu
> 'repeat_count' and 'current_path').
> 
> The kernel is a stock v4.7 with some debug options enabled (prominently
> DEBUG_PREEMPT). Need any more info?

As you can see from commit b0b477c7e0dd9 the round-robin path selector
is now using percpu data (pointer) and a percpu_counter.

I'm really not sure how else to access this percpu data.

Cc'ing LKML, linux-block, Jens and hch to cast a wider net in the hopes
of getting an answer to how to fix this.

       reply	other threads:[~2016-08-05 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160803153545.GE20370@bblock-ThinkPad-W530>
2016-08-05 15:27 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-08-05 15:33   ` bug: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code in rr_select_path() Jens Axboe
2016-08-05 15:42     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-08-05 15:54       ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-05 16:06         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-08-05 16:11           ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-07 15:49           ` Benjamin Block
2016-08-08 16:32           ` [dm-devel] " Benjamin Block
2016-08-08 16:39             ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-08 17:04               ` Benjamin Block

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160805152705.GA17480@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox