From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751613AbcHGGwl (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2016 02:52:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33403 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223AbcHGGwj (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2016 02:52:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:52:51 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Santosh Shilimkar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Tadeusz Struk , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Paul Bolle , Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] softirq: fix tasklet_kill() usage and users Message-ID: <20160807065251.GA13212@kroah.com> References: <1470111222-26919-1-git-send-email-ssantosh@kernel.org> <8888f797-27a4-a469-4566-740400686627@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8888f797-27a4-a469-4566-740400686627@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:07:14AM -0700, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > ping !! ping on a "RFC" after only 5 days in the middle of the merge window? That's bold... Personally, I rarely respond to RFC patches as obviously the submitter doesn't think they solve the issue at hand :)