From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752196AbcHHJKf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 05:10:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:36301 "EHLO mail-wm0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752101AbcHHJKd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 05:10:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:11:49 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: mfd: dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child() Message-ID: <20160808091149.GH5243@dell> References: <75c1cc23-3a2d-db78-d0f2-b5934b18e828@users.sourceforge.net> <20160628150725.GL24982@dell> <20160628163146.GG29166@dell> <69e96aa0-f3d9-d70d-c3ec-d39b5e9d9f14@users.sourceforge.net> <20160701091732.GK1707@dell> <8c0c2f06-4746-33d4-e40c-987ca3ca51dc@users.sourceforge.net> <20160805075016.GM5243@dell> <59b148eb-6a14-0721-7e4e-60b438fe8ec6@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <59b148eb-6a14-0721-7e4e-60b438fe8ec6@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 05 Aug 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > I'm unsure if you're not re-submitting because you're waiting for an > > answer for me or not. > > I found your five commits (on 2016-06-29) for this patch series > sufficient in principle. > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=d313cdde71ec9a5c327a515c37a0dca2cca00de5 > > > > If you are, here it is. And, don't do that. :) > > I find this feedback a bit strange. > > > > Please submit your patch-set *not* connected to this, now very > > tangled web of submissions, complete with all the Acks you've > > accrued. > > I would find it nice if another one of my update suggestions > could be integrated after a bit of feedback evolved for a special > source code search pattern. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9199519/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9208925/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9210291/ > > It seems to be harder to achieve acceptance similar to the others. I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say. Please rebase all of your unaccepted patches on v4.8-rc1. Apply any Acks that you've collected along the way and re-submit the set. Please ensure, when you re-submit, you do so using `git format-patch` and `git send-email`. Also ensure you do not send them attached to any other patch that you've previously sent. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog