From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752288AbcHHKnC (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:43:02 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:41802 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbcHHKnB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:43:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:42:51 +0300 From: Shamir Rabinovitch To: Qing Huang Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Grant Likely , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] device probe: add self triggered delayed work request Message-ID: <20160808104250.GA12480@shamir-linux.uk.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Qing, I suspect there is potential dead-lock with this patch: cpu0 cpu1 driver_deferred_probe_add deferred_probe_work_func ... mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex) mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex) bus_probe_device(dev) ... device return -EPROBE_DEFER ... driver_deferred_probe_add ... mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex) ... cancel_delayed_work(&deferred_probe_trigger_work) Please confirm if this scenario is possible. BR, Shamir Rabinovitch