From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751487AbcHIFBf (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:01:35 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:59795 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750914AbcHIFBd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:01:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:01:09 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: york sun Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "morbidrsa@gmail.com" , "oss@buserror.net" , Stuart Yoder , Doug Thompson , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Patch v3 03/11] driver/edac/mpc85xx_edac: Drop setting/clearing RFXE bit in HID1 Message-ID: <20160809050109.GA18922@nazgul.tnic> References: <1470351518-22404-1-git-send-email-york.sun@nxp.com> <1470351518-22404-4-git-send-email-york.sun@nxp.com> <20160808071111.GB20800@nazgul.tnic> <20160809033204.GA11445@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:31:19AM +0000, york sun wrote: > Yes, for most SoCs RFXE remains cleared. Uncorrectable errors are > handled by EDAC. And how is mpc85_xxx EDAC handling them? mpc85xx_mc_check() only reports them. And now to get to my original question: is it *enough* to report uncorrectable errors on those platforms or do they need more sophisticated error handling in order to disable data corruption? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --