From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mfd: dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child()
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:30:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160809093022.GU5243@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a2ef320-a95a-2611-2554-a2a83838fb9b@users.sourceforge.net>
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> v4: Further feedback was integrated into this message.
> >
> > This is not a good change-log. What actually changed?
>
> Which kind of information would you find more useful in this case?
That's for you to tell me surely?
If I wanted to know what changed, I would normally look at the patch
change-log. But the change-log in this patch says "I did some
stuff". What stuff did you change? Which review comments did you
tend to?
>
> >> @@ -222,19 +222,20 @@ static struct device *add_child(struct i2c_client *client, const char *name,
> >> status = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, &r, 1);
> >> if (status < 0) {
> >> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't add irq\n");
> >> - goto err;
> >> + goto put_device;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> status = platform_device_add(pdev);
> >> + if (status)
> >> + goto put_device;
> >>
> >> -err:
> >> - if (status < 0) {
> >> - platform_device_put(pdev);
> >> - dev_err(&client->dev, "can't add %s dev\n", name);
> >> - return ERR_PTR(status);
> >> - }
> >> return &pdev->dev;
> >> +
> >> +put_device:
> >> + platform_device_put(pdev);
> >> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to add device %s\n", name);
> >
> > ... and remove this line.
>
> -Do you really want that this error message should be deleted?
>
> How does this response fit to your request to introduce such a message
> for the function "add_numbered_child" (on 2016-06-08)?
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1162299.html
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/8/467
You've lost the context. The "..." is meant to intimate that it
follows on from a previous comment. In this case:
> > status = platform_device_add_data(pdev, pdata, pdata_len);
> > if (status < 0) {
> > dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't add platform_data\n");
>
> Please take the opportunity to convert these to dev_err()s.
So, convert the specific dev_dbg() calls to dev_err() and remove the
contentless one at the bottom.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 17:29 [PATCH v4] mfd: dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-05 7:55 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-08 11:36 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-09 9:30 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-08-09 9:56 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-09 15:36 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160809093022.GU5243@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).