From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752617AbcHIP1N (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:27:13 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:41032 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751522AbcHIP1M (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:27:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,495,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1037974569" Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:27:07 -0600 From: Ross Zwisler To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Ross Zwisler , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, Andrey Ryabinin , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] radix-tree: 'slot' can be NULL in radix_tree_next_slot() Message-ID: <20160809152707.GA14291@linux.intel.com> References: <20160808185747.21028-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:21:39PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: <> > NAK. This is fast path and it's already bloated. > I want to revert most changes here and rework "multiorder" entries. > > Here you can find almost ready patchset for that > https://github.com/koct9i/linux/commits/radix-tree Okay...are you okay with the second 2 patches in the series? They stand alone, and I believe are both good to have.