From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932362AbcHIRZG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:25:06 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35248 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932160AbcHIRZF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:25:05 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:24:55 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
        Michael Shaver <jmshaver@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched: Avoid that __wait_on_bit_lock() hangs
Message-ID: <20160809172455.GB13840@redhat.com>
References: <908d9eda-4942-270c-7431-bf56f0a62681@sandisk.com> <6e70b9d5-05ea-72f7-b6fe-2c900a5b4266@sandisk.com> <e6b146d9-bb6b-c4cc-9408-0fc77a612d1d@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e6b146d9-bb6b-c4cc-9408-0fc77a612d1d@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:25:04 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08/06, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> Although this patch works reliably in my tests, the above description
> does not explain the hang. I will resend this patch with a better
> description.

Yes please, I'll ignore this series till then ;)

See also another patch I sent a minute ago.

Oleg.