From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752421AbcHKU0G (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:26:06 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55210 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752160AbcHKU0C (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:26:02 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 22:25:44 +0200
From: rcochran@linutronix.de
To: Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, rt@linutronix.de,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT-RT] [patch 4 14/22] timer: Switch to a non cascading
 wheel
Message-ID: <20160811202544.GA20512@linutronix.de>
References: <20160704093956.299369787@linutronix.de>
 <20160704094342.108621834@linutronix.de>
 <CANe27j+-sm3nVZZg0U2LWCduKMVw6WJJwMa6aSaxB5M-d53kPw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANe27j+-sm3nVZZg0U2LWCduKMVw6WJJwMa6aSaxB5M-d53kPw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:21:26PM +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> The test code looked like this in python:
> 
>     addr = (url.hostname, url.port)
>     socks = {}
>     for i in range(20):
>         socks[i] = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM,
>                                  socket.IPPROTO_TCP)
>         socks[i].connect(addr)

You getting a timeout on TCP connect()?  Isn't that timeout really
long, like 75 seconds or something?
 
> I can reproduce this easily, so if someone wants to get more details
> of the issue, just let me know how to collect whatever would be
> useful.

Can you provide a simple test case or explain in more detail how you
run your test?  I would like to reproduce the issue it here.

Thanks,
Richard