From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752472AbcHNWvi (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:51:38 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:40222 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751015AbcHNWvh (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:51:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 00:51:32 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Daniel Wagner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Dubov , Ashutosh Dixit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sudeep Dutt , Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Use complete() instead of complete_all() Message-ID: <20160814225132.GH10501@katana> References: <1470389163-4594-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oox5VnwalALFvA7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470389163-4594-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --2oox5VnwalALFvA7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:25:59AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there > might be more than one reader. For -rt I am reviewing all > complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the > tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be > uses inside IRQ context and that can lead to unbounded amount work > inside the interrupt handler. That is a no no for -rt. >=20 > The patches grouped per subsystem and in small batches to allow > reviewing. Unfortanatly I am not so good in coming up with unique > commit message, so please bear with me in that regard. I could also > squash them together, although each patch containts a very short > reasoning why there is only one waiter. Let me know what you rather > prefer. One patch which updates all complete_all() users or those 4 > patches with some reasoning. >=20 > It is only test compiled because I don't have the all the hardware. All applied to for-current, thanks! --2oox5VnwalALFvA7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXsPX0AAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2c/YQAIY1MqbPkr+8uX2q1bz9x5sx 0VWpldn3vxcALo5tY462AmtZ9UwjSOPTcpTsMoNWkO5eMgHLTvTF2FwuqVFaDwMB yC8Jyw8MADRw18c/Znmbf+14fmrU6tpVPzco8d6FshwR23MgJSxK1SkUvuWzXJqH QldiTTve7Pth7KTQLPkNccnDeW6g6JHYayaF2t5E8m5n23P/hS9vTrCP+T1T9R5K j6aUPtLDy8mRytKon0iKtKP3B5/XlUMsoFcS4TDDtJJHBVFKzxZR140ps2DUa8F2 fFQLpTVamF1vWep18zd/JqkBCFpXU1k51tLurcFQeEBbL+nJtXP02kgqVk8HIl9h zNPxeHYc3zFTq0QOemofUmZ2EZgF8IL7vQ6sMSXfxj8wpz/coY01vQo44xaxMs6X GlcIWjgEBIHkDHytXD+aGjLZLJ5bWGVFjKCCl1DHkXF30epG+8jJJtdw51CVsizn DpI5xM4r/MCR99xZ2AmHUFonXLGCd9zniD46SkfEZqhAYUR44i7rB3ecqVuymTFp 0v2XhBCK5hxQZNJQb4o/Op7Mg9Oa+ZQi+6TbHC4qTCiHawW1aIzeBjhd5PKGkaIz SoSRoNwATWIBceGmMZnsB7KUmUzOJSTBxBUTAjcXPql4DNEQeoo1O4iPKfisCGzt Y6t9IiK65qPXg3BRLBqa =27hv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oox5VnwalALFvA7--