From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752966AbcHOQ7s (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:59:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34712 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752713AbcHOQ7q (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:59:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:59:41 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: perr Cc: tomasz.figa@gmail.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, kgene@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler Message-ID: <20160815165941.GA3769@kozik-lap> References: <1471256227-6282-1-git-send-email-strongbox8@zoho.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1471256227-6282-1-git-send-email-strongbox8@zoho.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 06:17:07PM +0800, perr wrote: > Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and > chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), > so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. > > Signed-off-by: perr > > --- > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > Looks correct so for the patch itself: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski However, your name "Perr" confuses me a little bit. For the Signed-off-by statement, as mentioned in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, a real name is required. The name should match the author. Would you be so kind as to use a full, real name? Unless Perr is your full, real name... then sorry for the trouble. Best regards, Krzysztof