From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Add include path to Makefile
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:53:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160816105315.GE28337@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471295658.4075.117.camel@perches.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:14:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 23:04 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:33:23PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Start to rationalize include paths in source code files.
> []
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/Makefile b/drivers/staging/lustre/Makefile
> []
> > > @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
> > > +subdir-ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/staging/lustre/include/
> > > +subdir-ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/
> > > +
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_LNET) += lnet/
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_LUSTRE_FS) += lustre/
> > This is good, but does this break the subdir make command:
> > make M=drivers/staging/lustre/foo_dir/
> > ?
>
> hmm, yeah, it does. Oh well, nevermind for awhile.
>
> > I remember the last time I tried to clean this up, it took a while...
>
> It seems like something the build tools should
> handle correctly now, but I'll look at it.
Nah, I think it's fine the way it is. What's wrong with the "../" type
things in the include directives? The build system works well with it,
you can build any single module or file correctly, and it's obvious what
the code is including from.
Now you might argue that the lustre code shouldn't have such a mess of
include files like this, and I would totally agree. I suggest working
on reducing the number of .h files they have, and centralizing them such
that all of these cross-directory includes aren't needed anymore either
in the build directives, or in the .c files.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-16 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-15 19:33 [PATCH 0/2] staging: lustre: #include neatening Joe Perches
2016-08-15 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Add include path to Makefile Joe Perches
2016-08-15 21:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-08-15 21:08 ` [lustre-devel] " James Simmons
2016-08-15 21:14 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-15 21:29 ` Building a subdirectory ignores parent subdir-ccflags (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Add include path to Makefile) Joe Perches
2016-08-15 22:07 ` Building a subdirectory ignores parent subdir-ccflags Michal Marek
2016-08-15 22:46 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-16 10:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2016-08-16 11:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Add include path to Makefile Joe Perches
2016-08-15 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: Remove .. paths from '#include "' uses Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160816105315.GE28337@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox