From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753422AbcHPMtS (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:49:18 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:57932 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753185AbcHPMtR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:49:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:00:24 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Steve Muckle , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Message-ID: <20160816120024.GI30192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <6346523.ZooER3FGDH@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6346523.ZooER3FGDH@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:01:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > There were some comments on the "cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags > and iowait boosting" series I sent some time ago and I wanted to address them, > but for this purpose I had to combine patches [1-2,4/7] from that series > into one and make some changes on top of that. > > Then I thought it would be better to send that separately from the iowait > boost part of that series, so here it goes. > > [1/2] Removes the util and max args from cpufreq_update_util() and governor > callbacks and adds a flags argument instead of them. That argument > is then used to handle RT and DL in schedutil and the utilization data > are accessed by it directly (so it is non-modular now to avoid exporting > the scheduler internals to modules). > [2/2] Replaces the time argument of cpufreq_update_util() with an rq pointer > which allows some simplifications to be made. > > There should be no changes in behavior as a result of this. > > The v2 is to address comments from Steve. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)