public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: callchain showing same entry as hist_entry
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:31:43 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160816153143.GJ20972@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160816152355.GC11382@danjae.aot.lge.com>

Em Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:23:55AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:08:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:55:11PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:36:28AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > 	please take a look at the patch below, and Ack if possible, it
> > > > is a problem introduced in:
> > > > 
> > > >   cfaa154b2335 ("perf tools: Get rid of obsolete hist_entry__sort_list")
> > > > 
> > > > That is not equivalent to the code that was there and results in having
> > > > the same entry as the first entry for the callchain as in the
> > > > hist_entry, which is annoying and doesn't match the original intent of
> > > > that 'continue' branch, as described in the comment right above it.
> > > 
> > > AFAIK the intent was to skip first callchain entry iff the first sort
> > > key is 'symbol'.  The sort_order being NULL means it'd use the default
> > > sort key which is 'comm,dso,sym' so it should not skip the first
> > > callchain entry.
> > > 
> > > The original code (before cfaa154b2335) was like below:
> > > 
> > > -                       if (!i++ && sort__first_dimension == SORT_SYM)
> > > +                       if (!i++ && field_order == NULL &&
> > > +                           sort_order && !prefixcmp(sort_order, "sym"))
> > > 
> > > I think the current code works as intended, no?
> > 
> > Well, see below the cset comment (local one, will change as we discuss),
> > may clarify further, but yeah, we can't take for granted that the
> > default sort order has "sym" in it :-\
> > 
> > So the original intent description was ambiguous, what we want to avoid
> > is what is in the cset comment below, so the logic for that should be a
> > bit different, tho.
> > 
> > For starters we need to have a callchain_something__first() that will
> > skip the first one using this logic and then use it in all places in
> > --stdio, --tui, --gtk where we need this.
> > 
> > commit c066eaa8d06b87c77b82d55bbc59be308aca4684
> > Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Date:   Tue Aug 16 11:36:50 2016 -0300
> > 
> >     perf callchain: Do not repeat the hist_entry symbol as the 1st callchain entry
> >     
> >     We were getting:
> >     
> >          2.62%  [k] __d_lookup_rcu
> >                 |
> >                 ---__d_lookup_rcu
> >                    |
> >                     --2.52%--lookup_fast
> >                               |
> >                                --2.50%--walk_component
> >     
> >     Noticed the __d_lookup_rcu dup, when the original coder intent, and the saner
> >     output is:
> >     
> >          2.62%  [k] __d_lookup_rcu
> >                 |
> >                  --2.52%--lookup_fast
> >                            |
> >                             --2.50%--walk_component
> >     
> >     This is for --stdio, TUI being investigated.
> 
> Did you run 'perf report -s sym --stdio'?  It seems that current code
> already works as sane..  Do you want to make it work for the default sort
>> key too?

What I want is not to repeat the hist_entry line as the first entry in
the callchain, which is confusing.

I.e. repeat the duplication that is happening with the default sort
entry, that contains "sym".

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-16 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-16 14:36 RFC: callchain showing same entry as hist_entry Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-16 14:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-16 14:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-16 15:08   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-16 15:23     ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-16 15:31       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-08-16 15:32         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-16 15:41           ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-16 15:46             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-16 19:21               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-19  2:20                 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160816153143.GJ20972@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox