From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753967AbcHRKX7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:23:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57191 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbcHRKX5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:23:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:23:49 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Ian Campbell Cc: arm@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren , Catalin Marinas , Lee Jones , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Anholt , Rob Herring , Gerd Hoffmann , Frank Rowand , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi Message-ID: <20160818102349.GC27045@leverpostej> References: <1470233565-30154-1-git-send-email-ijc@hellion.org.uk> <20160803144858.GA29054@leverpostej> <1470739709.4745.23.camel@hellion.org.uk> <1471504916.6295.32.camel@hellion.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1471504916.6295.32.camel@hellion.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > >  > > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell > > >  > > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this > > looks > > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW: > > >  > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > > > Thanks (and Stefan too). > > > > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf, > > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event > > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in > > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing. > > This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in > the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping? > > Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc > (via arm@k.o)? That's the right place. The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it. Thanks, Mark.