From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754066AbcHSIeb (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:34:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:38550 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752338AbcHSIe3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:34:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:35:57 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Rob Herring Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] dt-bindings: pwm: sti: Update DT bindings with recent changes Message-ID: <20160819083557.GK4254@dell> References: <20160816093508.28307-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160816093508.28307-18-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20160818192002.GA26225@rob-hp-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160818192002.GA26225@rob-hp-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to > > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where > > we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to > > describe them as devices. > > This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine. Yes, you are right. Perhaps if this is okay with Thierry, he can remove these few lines. If not, I don't mind re-sending on request. I'll leave it until I hear otherwise. > > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM > > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as an IRQ line. > > We're also adding a new property similar to the one described > > above, but for capture channels. Typically, there will be less > > capture channels than PWM-out, since all channels have the latter > > capability, but only some have capture support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-st.txt | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog