The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] tracing: Add Hardware Latency detector tracer
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:05:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160819150551.GE10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160819102620.763bd7a0@gandalf.local.home>

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:26:20AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > In any case, for those you could probably use ktime_get_mono_fast_ns().
> 
> Is that safe to call from NMI?

It should be, we were very careful to make it so. Also read the comment
with __ktime_get_fast_ns().

> Looking into the code I see:
> 
> 	now = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base) + timekeeping_get_ns(tkr);
> 
> where timekeeping_get_ns() has:
> 
> 	timekeeping_get_delta()
> 
> which does:
> 
> 	read_seqcount_begin()
> 
> which has (eventually):

That's a bug in CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING, if you look at the
!timekeeping_get_delta() it does no such thing.

John, looks like 4ca22c2648f9 ("timekeeping: Add warnings when overflows
or underflows are observed") buggered things.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-19 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-10 13:53 [PATCH v2 0/4] tracing: Add Hardware Latency detector tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] tracing: Added hardware latency tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-22 17:27   ` Nilay Vaish
2016-08-22 19:16     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] tracing: Add documentation for hwlat_detector tracer Steven Rostedt
2016-08-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] tracing: Have hwlat trace migrate across tracing_cpumask CPUs Steven Rostedt
2016-08-10 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tracing: Add NMI tracing in hwlat detector Steven Rostedt
2016-08-12 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] tracing: Add Hardware Latency detector tracer Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2016-08-19 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-19 14:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-19 15:05     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-08-19 16:36       ` John Stultz
2016-08-23  8:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-23  8:48           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160819150551.GE10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox