From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
markus.heiser@darmarit.de, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation/sphinx: link dma-buf rsts
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:08:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160823070818.42ffec00@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160823060135.GJ24290@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:01:35 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> I'm also not too sure about whether dma-buf really should be it's own
> subdirectory. It's plucked from the device-drivers.tmpl, I think an
> overall device-drivers/ for all the misc subsystems and support code would
> be better. Then one toc there, which fans out to either kernel-doc and
> overview docs.
I'm quite convinced it shouldn't be.
If you get a chance, could you have a look at the "RFC: The beginning of
a proper driver-api book" series I posted yesterday (yes, I should have
copied more of you, sorry)? It shows the direction I would like to go
with driver API documentation, and, assuming we go that way, I'd like the
dma-buf documentation to fit into that.
Thanks,
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 15:11 [PATCH v2 0/2] doc: dma-buf: sphinx conversion Sumit Semwal
2016-08-22 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: move dma-buf documentation to rst Sumit Semwal
2016-08-22 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation/sphinx: link dma-buf rsts Sumit Semwal
2016-08-22 15:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-08-23 6:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-23 9:20 ` Markus Heiser
2016-08-23 13:08 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2016-08-23 13:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-23 14:16 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-08-23 15:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-23 16:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-08-23 13:33 ` Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160823070818.42ffec00@lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.heiser@darmarit.de \
--cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox