From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753026AbcHXHdo (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:33:44 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:34102 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752094AbcHXHca (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:32:30 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,569,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="752811962" Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:31:34 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Peter Chen , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Neil Armstrong , Arnd Bergmann , Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] usb: ulpi: Support device discovery via device properties Message-ID: <20160824073134.GB12117@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20160707222114.1673-1-stephen.boyd@linaro.org> <20160707222114.1673-4-stephen.boyd@linaro.org> <20160708090458.GB20485@shlinux2> <147043245520.26915.14153612182716236022@sboyd-linaro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:58:07PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-07-08 02:04:58) > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:20:54PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > @@ -39,6 +42,10 @@ static int ulpi_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *driver) > >> > struct ulpi *ulpi = to_ulpi_dev(dev); > >> > const struct ulpi_device_id *id; > >> > > >> > + /* Some ULPI devices don't have a product id so rely on OF match */ > >> > + if (ulpi->id.product == 0) > >> > + return of_driver_match_device(dev, driver); > >> > + > >> > >> How about using vendor id? It can't be 0, but pid may be 0. > >> See: http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids > > > > Heikki suggested a product id of 0 would mean we need to use DT > > matching. Should it be changed to vendor id instead? > > Any comments here? It makes sense. I don't have any problem with that. Thanks, -- heikki