From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932837AbcHXSj4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:39:56 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:47494 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755292AbcHXSjy (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:39:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:15:31 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Ralph Sennhauser Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Gregory CLEMENT Subject: Re: [Regression?] Commit cb4f71c429 deliberately changes order of network interfaces Message-ID: <20160824201531.4618fdcf@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <20160824191004.3b4ff2cb@gmail.com> References: <20160821151158.78da01e6@gmail.com> <20160824165011.6c811913@free-electrons.com> <20160824191004.3b4ff2cb@gmail.com> Organization: Free Electrons X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:10:04 +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > Going forward, as we disagree and it's basically a political decision, > whom do we ask to rule here? Linus? I don't think Linus will care about random issues on a random platform :-) The people who can take this decision are rather the maintainers of the platform itself, or possibly the arm-soc maintainers if you still don't like what the platform maintainers decided. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com